| 
 
            
 
          
 
          European Rabbis Throughout the Generations
 
          
          Translated from Hebrew
           
          
          
            
                | 
                | 
             
            
                | 
              The
                ReMa, Rabbi Moses ben Israel Isserles (1525-1572), Polish
                rabbi, code annotator, and philosopher. | 
             
           
          In our genealogical searches, all of us, including those who
          consider themselves secular, soon discover that in most cases our
          ancestors are rabbinic families. This study will focus on these
          families and in particular the Ashkenazic rabbinic families in Europe.
          While a portion of Ashkenazic Jewry traces its origins to those Jews
          who came from Spain and Portugal following the Expulsion in 1492, with
          some arriving both before and after the Expulsion, a number of Jews
          came in the 11th and 12th centuries from the Near East in the
          footsteps of the Radanites, merchants who brought goods from China to
          Europe, and some were Khazars who appeared after their defeat by the
          Russian army. These Jews settled in Western, Northern, and Eastern
          Europe and established communities. Most families who trace their
          origin to Europe are descended from these Jews and from the rabbis who
          served them. 
          The Ashkenazic rabbinate that evolved over time in these
          communities had its origins in the rabbinic tradition dating from some
          300 years BCE. The historic background of the rabbinic establishment
          and a description of the Jewish home and way of life will be portrayed
          before discussing the genealogical aspect of the topic. 
          
         
          
          
            |  | The
                title 'Rabbi,' whose meaning is teacher, was first given to R.
                Gamliel the Elder (d. 46 BCE). |   |    |   
          
          
          Over the years, from the time of the revelation at Sinai shortly
          after our departure from Egypt, our sages, teachers, and religious
          leaders guided the spiritual and physical development of our people.
          The Mishnah states: "Moses received the Torah at Sinai, he
          transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the Elders, the Elders to the
          prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly - Knesset
          HaGdola" (Ethics of the Fathers/Pirkei Avot 1:1). The title 'Rabbi,' whose meaning is
          teacher, was first given to R. Gamliel the
          Elder (d. 46 BCE). Neither his father Simon, nor his grandfather
          Hillel the Elder, were known by this title. R. Judah the Prince (d.
          209 CE) was known simply as 'Rabbi.' In Babylonia, the term 'Mar' was
          added to the title and in the time of the Geonim the title was 'Mar Rabbi.' Among Sephardic Jews the
          title 'Haham' came
          into use instead of 'Rabbi,' and in the areas ruled by the Ottoman
          Empire, the rabbi of the community was called 'Haham Bashi.'
          In the time of the Talmud, the title 'Rabbi' implied community
          leadership. "R. Yohanan states; ' Who is wise? One who answers any
          question of Jewish law asked of him.' " (BT Shabbat 114a). The
          Talmud frequently mentions the word 'Rabbanan' as being equivalent to
          scholars. 
          Many of the Talmudic sages were farmers, some were craftsmen and
          artisans while some were merchants. One-third of the day, they worked
          at their occupations and two-thirds of the day they devoted to study.
          The farmers worked throughout the summer and spent the winter in
          study. 
          Throughout the ages, rabbinic ordination required years of study at
          Yeshivot and guidance from ordained rabbis. At the conclusion
          of the required studies, the candidate was examined and granted
          rabbinic ordination - S'mikha. This ordination permitted one to
          arbitrate disputes between people and resolve matters of Jewish law
          and religious practices. There were instances, as in many other areas
          of life, where economic, political, or social pressures, and even
          family connections, paved the way to rabbinic ordination. 
          Although the rabbinic status is not formally passed down by
          inheritance, rabbis preferred that their sons receive proper education
          and be ordained as rabbis. The atmosphere in which rabbinic sons were
          raised made it easier for them and gave them certain advantages. In
          spite of the advantages enjoyed by rabbis' sons, and the pressures
          applied to them at times, they did not always choose to follow in
          their father's footsteps. Some preferred other trades while others
          even abandoned the way of life in which they were raised. 
          Scholars and rabbis enjoyed honor and esteem and their students
          would rise in their presence. For the most part, they were exempt from
          the taxes imposed by the government on their communities. The rabbis
          headed Yeshivot, served as judges, and preached to their
          communities at least twice a year,  Shabbat Hagadol - the Sabbath
          before Pesah, and  Shabbat Shuvah - the Sabbath between  Rosh Hashanah
          and  Yom Kippur. The rabbi was also expected to appear in clean and
          neat clothing. 
          Maimonides (Rambam), in the 12th century, opposed rabbis receiving
          payment for performing rabbinic functions and so many engaged in
          other work or commerce, or were supported by their wives who ran
          stores, or received an allowance granted to them by the community.
          This was not adequate to live on, so they had to find other sources
          of income. Money changing and loans at interest to gentiles were among
          the occupations of the rabbis and their families. Some rabbis even
          amassed wealth and possessions. 
          In a lecture delivered by the late Dr. Paul Jacobi in celebration
          of his 85th birthday, he noted that the Jews of Europe were witnesses
          to a "Holocaust," in his words, that took place over time
          between the 13th and 17th centuries when pogroms, massacres, murder,
          and expulsions were the fate of most of the Jewish communities in
          Western and Central Europe. Entire communities were uprooted as
          expulsion followed expulsion whether in the Rhine valley, Spain,
          Portugal, Sicily, Lithuania, Provence, and other places. Those who
          survived the evictions settled, if possible, in new localities close
          to their original homes, or moved in the direction of Eastern Europe
          or the Mediterranean Basin. As a result, laws and customs were
          forgotten or changed and Jews of the time were not as scrupulous in
          the observance of the commandments. This trend also changed the
          function of the rabbis who were needed to support these newly founded
          communities, to strengthen their faith, and guide them in their
          careful adherence to commandments and customs. This period, between
          the 13th and 15th centuries, was when books on customs and laws were
          written to guide the people (see Appendix I).
          The words of R. Isaac  Tirna (b. 1380), in
          the introduction to his book Sefer HaMinhagim, are
          instructive:  
          
            "Since, as a result of our great sins, the numbers of those
            engaged in study and the number of scholars has decreased; and
            because of the drastic reduction of knowledgeable God fearing men
            and men of good deeds in Austria, to the point that I have seen
            communities where one cannot even find two or three people who are
            familiar with the religious practices of their own communities, let
            alone with the practices of other locations, I take it upon
            myself..." 
           
          These guides led directly to the great undertakings of the Rema (R.
          Moses Isserles),  Darkhei Moshe and  HaMapah on the
           Shulhan Arukh, that
          set the basis for the rules, laws, and customs of Ashkenazic Jewry. 
          
         
          
          
            |  | Today most of the Jews of
          European origin, religious and secular alike, are descended from
          rabbinic families active between the 12th and 18th centuries. |   |    |   
          
          
          In an earlier article (Klausner,  Sharsheret Hadorot 15-1), it
          was pointed out how the Torah, that is the mass of Jewish literature,
          attached importance to Jewish genealogy. The  Torah and subsequently
          the  Talmud (including the Mishnah,  Gemara and Tosefta), and the
          Responsa were all transmitted by the rabbis. The rabbis are generally
          divided into two groups: the Rishonim, that is the early rabbis,
          those who flourished before the Expulsion from Spain in 1492, and the Aharonim, that is the latter rabbis, those who functioned from 1492 to
          the present. They all fostered genealogy in that they were careful to
          record their names and their lineage. The article also mentions that
          the rabbis valued the importance of family pedigree, as it is written,
          "You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God Am holy" (Leviticus
          19:2), and they prepared family trees for themselves. Today,
          we have a vast rabbinic literature that contains a great deal of
          genealogical information. As was mentioned, today most of the Jews of
          European origin, religious and secular alike, are descended from
          rabbinic families active between the 12th and 18th centuries.
          Because of the burdens of life and the demands made on living
          according to Jewish law the tendency in the past was to move from a
          religious to a secular lifestyle, and from there, with all of the pain
          it involved, even beyond the boundaries of the Jewish people. The
          opening of the New World to immigration, the development of the
          emancipation movements in the 18th and 19th centuries, along with the
          various declarations on human rights, also led to the crumbling of
          various Jewish structures. This process accelerated increasing
          assimilation. From this time forward the careful listing of rabbinic
          genealogies also declined. There is no scientific proof for the theory
          that most if not all of us are descended from rabbis or rabbinic
          families. The only proof would be through the rediscovery of the names
          of our ancestors dating back a few centuries. 
          A good case in point of what took place can be seen with the 
          Eskeles family that was also mentioned in the lecture by Rabbi Meir
          Wunder at the Israel Genealogical Society, Jerusalem Branch meeting,
          in January 2001. The family's founder was R. Gabriel  Liva-Eskeles
          (1655-1718) of Krakow, the great-grandson of R. Sinai Liva, the
          brother of the Maharal of Prague. One of his sons was Issachar Dov 
          Eskeles (1691-1753), head of the rabbinic court of Vienna and Nikolsburg, whose wife was the
          granddaughter of R. Samson Wertheimer, the rabbi of Eisenstadt and the
          Chief Rabbi of Austria. His son Bernard, who was born after his
          father's death, was a banker of great wealth who received the title of
          Baron  von Eskeles. While he and his wife remained Jews, their children
          were baptized and married into the Christian high society of Vienna.
          His son Dennis Daniel Baron von Eskeles (1803-1876) married the
          Italian baroness Emilia  Bretanno-Cimerli and their six daughters
          married generals, barons, nobles, and titled aristocrats, all of them
          Christians. Thus, an entire rabbinic family was lost to Judaism in the
          span of three generations. Comparable events transpired in other
          Jewish families. It must be pointed out that in the last generations,
          a number of descendants of this branch of the  Eskeles family returned
          to Judaism and married Jews. 
          Dr. Jacobi often spoke of between 60 and 80 old rabbinic families,
          who are the ancestors of all of the Ashkenazic Jewish families of
          today. In this article, an attempt has been made to create a list of
          these 80 families (see Appendix II). This
          list will naturally reflect personal inclinations, but I believe that
          it is not far from being accurate or from the list that Dr. Jacobi
          would formulate. 
          Among these families, there are 'weak' and there are 'strong'
          families. Strong families I call those families who had numerous
          children, married into many other families, produced many scholars and
          rabbis, were rooted in the community, and preserved their names, in
          other words, they left their mark and thereby enhanced, genealogical
          study. A short list of these 'strong' families would include Katzenellenbogen,
          Margolis / Margaliot, Horowitz-Segal, Shapiro, Rappaport,
          Frankel, Ashkenazi, Katz-Cohen, Ginzberg, Jaffe,
          Halperin, Halevi, Landau, Lipshitz, Zack-Zackheim,
          and Brode. The genealogical
          ancestry of these families dates between the 10th and 15th
          centuries, and even before. 
          An example of a 'weak' family is Klausner, whose name dates from
          the 13th century. It produced noted scholars and rabbis, but they did not carry on their
          name and over the years some changed it to Bushke, Lieberman,
          Witkind, Ellenberg, Finkelstein, Weissbrot,
          Zeinvirt, Oz, and others. They were
          independently minded. Some of their rabbis corresponded with the false
          messiahs that developed in Judaism while others joined the Hasidic
          movement. Still others became scientists and authors. I cannot recall
          any genealogical literature dating from the 13th to 16th
          centuries that does not mention members of this family either with the
          name  Klausner  or the other family names. Additional 'weak' families
          include Buchner, Getz, Yallish, and others. 
          As already mentioned, rabbis' sons were expected to follow in their
          fathers' footsteps, continue their studies in  Yeshivot and opt for the
          rabbinate. With all the honor and respect that the rabbinate enjoyed,
          and, on occasion, the economic security that it brought, the sons of
          rabbis did not always demonstrate the qualifications required or the
          desire to enter the rabbinate. In the best of circumstances, they
          chose to enter a profession or go into business, in the worst of
          circumstances, they distanced themselves to a greater or lesser extent
          from their fathers' lifestyle. Occasionally, we find conflicting
          accounts in rabbinic sources where in one of them some of the sons are
          not mentioned. The reason was not a lack of correct information in the
          writer's hands, but the desire not to reveal facts about the children
          that were not pleasant or desirable to the author. 
          
          After the great disillusionment from the movements of the false
          messiahs, Shabbtai Zvi (1626-1676) and Jacob  Frank (1726-1791), there
          were two major rifts, which mostly resulted from the liberation
          movements, which were nourished by the rabbinic establishment and
          remain with us today. 
          
         
          
          
            |  | R.
                Israel the son of Eliezer, the Baal Shem Tov (1698-1760), from
                Okup in the Ukraine, founded the Hasidic Movement. |   |    |   
          
          
           R. Israel the son of Eliezer, the  Baal
          Shem Tov (1698-1760), from Okup in the Ukraine, founded the Hasidic
          Movement. At an early age, he was orphaned from his father and spent
          most of his time in seclusion, in prayer in the bosom of nature, in the
          study of  Kabbalah, and the teaching of small children. He settled in
          Miedzhibozh at the age of 36 after the death of his first wife and his
          second marriage to Hannah, the daughter of R. Ephraim  Ashkenazi of
          Kuty and the sister of R. Abraham Gershon  Ashkenazi  of Kuty. Many
          gathered around him to hear the words of the Torah, flavored with the
          Fear of God, all with a lucidity that they could understand.
          Initially, his followers were made up of simple people, but over time
          they were joined by educated individuals knowledgeable in Torah as
          well as scholars. After he succeeded in attracting the support of R.
          Dov Ber the son of Abraham (the family used the
          surname  Friedman in later generations), also known as the Magid of
          Miedzyrzec (1704-1773), Miedzhibozh became the Hasidic center whose
          influence reached distant communities including Eretz Yisrael. 
          The basic principle of Hasidism is that the Divine is found
          everywhere and in everything, even in matters that seem to be of no
          importance, and therefore one is able to serve God in many ways. This
          can fill the individual with hope, optimism, and joy in his worldly
          existence. There is no reason to refrain from joyousness and the
          enjoyment of the senses; one was to purify and distill them through
          the service of God with body and soul. Sinners have no reason to
          despair because everyone is eligible for 'Tikun' - correction.
          Prayer with enthusiasm is of utmost importance and joyousness is an
          indispensable component of prayer. 
          Among the disciples and colleagues of the  Baal Shem Tov were the
          following: his son, Zvi of Miedzhibozh (d. 1780); his son-in-law,
          Yechiel son of Barukh  Ashkenazi of Miedzybozh (d. 1783); R. Dov Ber,
          the Magid of Miedzyrzec, who became his successor; R. Jacob Joseph son
          of Samson of Polonnoye (d. 1784); R. Pinhas son of Abraham Abba 
          Shapira  of Korets, (1728-1790); R. Shabbtai of Rashkov (1655-1745); R.
          Meir son of Jacob of Przemyslan (1711-1773); R. Tzvi Hirsh son of
          David of Kamionka (d. 1780); R. Yechiel Michel son of Isaac of Zloczow (1721-1781); Nahum son of
          Tzvi  Twersky of Chernobyl (1730-1797), R. Schneur Zalman of Lyady (1747-1813) and others. The Hasidic Movement aroused great
          ferment in contemporary rabbinic circles. Opponents to Hasidism, led
          by R. Eliyahu the son of Solomon Hasid, the  Gaon of Vilna (1720-1797),
          were supported by almost the entire rabbinic establishment and became
          known as  Mitnagdim (Opponents). The clash between them became so
          bitter that in 1772 the Vilna Rabbinate issued a general
          excommunication edict against Hasidim, which was supported by the  Gaon
          of Vilna. At that time, the  Hasidim were subjected to being shunned
          and driven from communities. Nevertheless, the Hasidic Movement spread
          rapidly in Romania, the Ukraine, Ruthenia, Hungary, Galicia, and other
          locations, becoming an integral and important part of contemporary
          Judaism. A separate article on the Hasidic Movement and its various
          divisions will follow. 
          
         
          
          
            |  | The
                second split in Judaism came with the establishment of the
                Reform Movement. |   |    |   
          
          
          The second split in Judaism came with the
          establishment of the Reform Movement. Its path differed from that of
          traditional and conservative Rabbinic Judaism, known from then on as
          Orthodox Judaism. Neither of these groups was homogeneous as both had
          factions with different goals and changing emphases. 
          Reform Judaism has both historic and sociological importance, but
          in the area of genealogical study, its importance is far less than
          that of the Orthodox rabbinate. The Reform rabbinate did not associate
          any importance to the recording of their family lineage. 
          Until the end of the 18th century, it was clear that the study
          of Torah was the ultimate value. The 'Enlightenment' and the
          Emancipation shattered this consensus, and the Reform Movement
          benefited from this new development. At other times as well, there
          were sects that were on the periphery of mainstream Judaism and Rabbinic
          Judaism. The Saducees in the time of the Second Temple (in
          contrast to the Pharisees), the Karaites in the Middle Ages, and other
          groups denied the validity of certain aspects of Judaism, for example
          the authority of the Oral Law. Reform Judaism abandoned large portions
          even of the Written Tradition and introduced radical changes in the pattern of ritual. 
          The rabbinic establishment was unable to cope in an effective way
          with the Reform Movement, but there were some rabbis who rallied to
          the challenge. Among them was R. Isaac  Bernays of Hamburg who opposed
          their liturgical changes and protested their using the word 'Temple'
          for their synagogues. Together with R. Zecharias  Frankel he
          established the Jewish Theological Seminary of Breslau to prepare its
          students to challenge Reform. R. Samson Raphael  Hirsch of Frankfurt
          was another of the opponents of Reform. 
          
          Rabbinic literature attests to the importance of this genre. It has
          many facets and expressions such as commentaries on the  Torah and
          Talmud, discussions on Jewish Law and Responsa, Kabbalah, Legends,
          
          Musar (Ethical Movement) and more. Rabbinic literature includes
          genealogical information of all kinds: 
          
            - Some rabbis included in the introduction of their works a
          detailed genealogical description of their families, including their
          children, those whom they married, and important dates in the life of
          the family. Some of this information was included in their
          commentaries and Responsa, as was mentioned previously.
 
            - Rabbis, their descendants, historians or researchers wrote
          detailed genealogical material on rabbis and their families.
 
            - Family trees of certain rabbinic families were prepared by
          family members or by others at the request of the family.
 
           
         
          
          
            |  | Many
                examples of this type of rabbinic literature can be found over
                the past 400 years up to our own day. |   |    |   
          
          
          Many examples of this type of rabbinic literature can be found over
          the past 400 years up to our own day. Most of it is in Hebrew and only
          in the past decades has it appeared in other languages. For a
          selection of this genre of literature, see
          Appendix III. 
          It was very common for rabbis to be known by the titles of their
          books: the  Noda B'Yehudah is R. Ezekiel  Landau (1713-1793); the
           Tzemah Tzedek
          is R. Menachem Mendel Schneursohn (1789 -1866); the  S'mikhat Hahamim is R. Naftali Tzvi son of Isaac
           Katz  (1649-1719);
          the  M'galeh Amukot is R. Nathan Neta  Shapira (1585-1633), etc. Some
          titles give us hints of the author's names, for example,  P'nai
          Yehoshua was written by Joshua son of Joseph (1593-1648),  Shaagat
          Arieh was written by R. Arieh Leib son of Asher  Ginsburg (1695-1785),
          
          Aderet Eliyahu was written by R. Eliyahu Hasid, the  Gaon of Vilna
          (1720-1797), and  Shearit Yosef  of R. Yosef son of Gershon  Katz
          (1511-1591), etc. 
          
          A historical survey has been presented here of the development of
          the Jewish communities in Europe, the role of the rabbis in these
          communities and the connecting thread that leads from the sages of
          the Talmud to the generations of the rabbis of Europe, who were
          faithful to the study of the Torah and the preservation of its laws by
          their legal decisions whenever a question arose. 
          Covered were the changing circumstances, both for better and for
          worse, as well as the problems confronting Judaism whose origins were
          in threats that originated among the people with whom the Jews lived as well as internal challenges and
          divisions. The rabbinic establishment had to cope with all these
          dangers and the rabbis had to rise to the challenges. 
          As rabbinic families married among themselves, even though they did
          marry other Jews as well, and as rabbinic literature transmitted
          family pedigrees, most of us can find our ancestral origins among
          these rabbinic families. 
           
    Dr. Yehuda Klausner is a Civil Engineer with BSc,
    CE, MA from the Technion IIT Haifa and PhD from Princeton University. He served as
    Professor of Civil Engineering at Wayne State University Detroit and The Negev Institute of Arid
    Zone Research, Beer-Sheva, and since 1970 is a practicing Civil Engineer specializing in
    industrial structures and foundation engineering. He published many
    professional papers and a book on Continuum Mechanics of Soils. In 1982 he
    became interested in genealogical studies and now his database comprises
    several families that he is researching. E-mail: yklaus@macam.ac.il. 
     This article was originally published in
          Sharsheret Hadorot (Journal of Jewish Genealogy of the Israel
    Genealogical Society), June 2001, Vol. 15, No. 3, and is reproduced with
          kind permission of the editor, Yocheved Klausner. 
      
         
  
  |